Russia and China vetoed a US-backed resolution to keep UN experts monitoring Iran's nuclear sanctions. Fair pushback against a biased process, or cover for Tehran?
It ends independent oversight just as the IAEA referred Iran's non-compliance to the Security Council for the first time in 20 years. The vote was 11 in favour, with Russia and China vetoing and Pakistan and Somalia abstaining.
What happened
Russia and China vetoed a US-drafted UN Security Council resolution that would have extended the mandate of a panel of experts monitoring sanctions reimposed on Iran in 2025 over its nuclear program. The panel's mandate was already idle for about a year because the Council could not agree on new members, and its expiration ends independent reporting on possible sanctions violations. The veto came as the IAEA referred Iran's non-compliance with nuclear safeguards to the Security Council, the first such referral in 20 years.
Why people disagree
The US, UK and France argue that killing the monitoring panel removes the Security Council's main independent source of reporting on Iran's compliance, and that Russia and China are shielding Tehran from scrutiny. Russia and China argue the underlying JCPOA sanctions framework itself expired in October 2025 and call the American push politically motivated, saying diplomacy should take priority over sanctions enforcement.
What's still unclear
Whether France's proposed workaround, a monitoring team made up of France, Germany, the UK and the US outside the Security Council, actually forms and can substitute for the independent panel, or whether Iran's nuclear file effectively goes unmonitored.
Sources
More takes
Hoax bomb threats have hit dozens of European flights this week, with planes diverted and fighter jets scrambled. Safe and sensible, or just what the hoaxers want?
France kept this weekend's cost-of-living protests out of city centres to protect shops after October's riots. Sensible public order, or a curb on the right to protest?
