A hundred pages in, it still isn't clicking, but you've already invested the time. Should you finish a book you're not enjoying?
A quiet, personal debate that comes up every time someone is deciding whether to keep going or put a book down for good.
What happened
Reading communities regularly discuss whether to persist with an unenjoyable book, especially as reading-tracking apps make it easier to see how many books get abandoned partway through.
Why people disagree
Finishers argue books can turn around late, and that following through builds a habit of not giving up when things get difficult. Quitters argue reading time is finite and better spent on something that's actually working, and that a bad match isn't a moral failing.
What's still unclear
Whether abandoning books more freely changes what people get out of reading overall, for better or worse, compared to sticking with a habit of finishing.
Sources
← The oldest trade-off in education policy: broader access to university, or a broader tax burden regardless of who benefits. Should university be free, even if everyone pays more tax for it?Norway is considering becoming the first country to ban camera-equipped smart glasses like Meta's and Snap's. Needed privacy protection, or regulation racing ahead of useful tech? →
More takes
Always Open
A Scottish animal charity wants private fireworks banned across the UK, leaving only organised displays. Should garden fireworks on Bonfire Night be outlawed?
Always Open
A new YouGov survey finds 53% of 18-24s prefer TV and films with the subtitles on. A sensible fix for mumbled dialogue, or a habit that gets in the way?
Always Open