US strikes on Iranian oil tankers, Iran hits back in Jordan — is this heading somewhere worse?
Escalating tit-for-tat military action in the Gulf region has raised fears of broader regional conflict.
What happened
US Central Command destroyed five Iranian oil tankers — the Kaviz, Charminar, Horizon 1, Riesco and Derya — on September 8–9, after saying Iran's Revolutionary Guard tried twice in two days to target a US Navy warship near the Strait of Hormuz. Iran retaliated by attacking roughly ten ships near Hormuz and firing missiles at the US-linked Al-Azraq air base in Jordan; Jordan's military says it intercepted 18 of the 20 missiles, with no casualties. A commercial cargo ship was also hit off Iraq's coast. Iran's Foreign Ministry called the US strikes a ‘war crime’; US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Iran would keep losing tankers for every attempted attack.
Why people disagree
Supporters of the US action see it as proportionate self-defense and deterrence — protecting a US warship and freedom of navigation through one of the world's most important oil chokepoints. Critics say destroying five tankers is a major escalation well beyond intercepting a threat, and that striking near Jordan risks pulling a third country into a US–Iran conflict and pushing the region toward a wider war.
What's still unclear
Iran disputes the US account of what happened near the warship, and neither side's damage claims (Iran says it hit hangars and a destroyer at Al-Azraq) have been independently verified. It's also unclear whether this is a contained tit-for-tat exchange or the start of a longer escalation.
Sources
More takes
Democrats have won control of the US House in the midterms, with NBC projecting about 255 seats. Should they now move to impeach Donald Trump for a third time?
PM Andy Burnham says he is open to a formal UK apology for the slave trade, but rules out reparations. Should Britain apologise, and should money follow?
