Alberta is voting on whether to start the legal process toward a referendum on leaving Canada. Should a region be able to vote itself out of its country?
A leave win would not make Alberta independent; it would begin the process toward a later binding vote. More than 1.35 million Albertans voted early. Premier Danielle Smith called the vote but opposes separation, and First Nations leaders say Alberta can't leave without their consent under treaties that predate the province.
What happened
Albertans vote on 19 October on whether the province should remain in Canada or begin the legal process toward a future binding referendum on separation. It is one of ten questions on the ballot. More than 1.35 million people, 43% of eligible voters, cast advance or special ballots, against 810,000 early voters at the 2023 provincial election. Premier Danielle Smith called the vote but opposes independence. Prime Minister Mark Carney told a rally to "vote like Canada's future depends on it because it does". Polls suggested roughly four in five Albertans want to stay.
Why people disagree
Separatists say Alberta, which has the world's fourth-largest proven oil reserves, sends too much money to Ottawa and has been hurt by federal energy policy, from the 1980s National Energy Program to the carbon tax, so voters deserve a direct say. Opponents, including Carney, say even a protest vote means years of division and uncertainty, and First Nations leaders say treaties predating the province mean it cannot leave without their consent.
What's still unclear
Many yes voters may not want to leave: Viewpoint Alberta data suggests two-thirds back the referendum for strategic reasons, to send Ottawa a message. It is also unclear whether the movement survives a loss, and how any exit would work in practice.
Sources
More takes
Hoax bomb threats have hit dozens of European flights this week, with planes diverted and fighter jets scrambled. Safe and sensible, or just what the hoaxers want?
France kept this weekend's cost-of-living protests out of city centres to protect shops after October's riots. Sensible public order, or a curb on the right to protest?
